Substandard
Authorized products that fail to meet their quality standards or specifications — often through poor manufacturing practice or inadequate quality control.1
May come from a legitimate maker, in legitimate packaging.
Research brief
What they are, what the evidence says about their scale and harm, why Afghanistan is exposed — and what a photograph of a medicine pack can, and cannot, establish.
1 · The scale
In 2017 the World Health Organization published the first systematic estimate, drawing on a review of studies and on reports to its global surveillance system.
Reports reflect where surveillance is strong as much as where the problem is. The absence of reports from a country is not evidence of the absence of the problem.4
2 · Definitions
WHO distinguishes products by how they fail. The distinction decides what kind of evidence can reveal each one.
Substandard
Authorized products that fail to meet their quality standards or specifications — often through poor manufacturing practice or inadequate quality control.1
May come from a legitimate maker, in legitimate packaging.
Falsified
Products that deliberately misrepresent their identity, composition or source, made to deceive buyers for profit.1
An imitation, by definition — of a brand, a maker, a pack.
3 · The harm
It fails the patient, delays effective treatment, wastes scarce money and — for antimicrobials — feeds drug resistance. Two models commissioned for WHO's 2017 study give the order of magnitude.
72,000–169,000
children may die each year from pneumonia because of substandard and falsified antibiotics.2
Model: University of Edinburgh
116,000
additional malaria deaths a year in sub-Saharan Africa (range 64,000–158,000) from substandard and falsified antimalarials.2
Model: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Modelled estimates for particular diseases and regions, cited for their order of magnitude — not as figures for Afghanistan.
4 · Afghanistan
Reliable national estimates are scarce, and we do not cite figures we cannot source. What is well established are the conditions — and Afghanistan presents many of them.
Packs reach the shelf from many manufacturing countries, labelled in English, Urdu, Persian, Turkish and more. A pharmacist must judge packaging from many markets.
Inspection and laboratory testing capacity is limited relative to the size and fragmentation of the market.
Medicines move through wholesalers, small pharmacies and informal sellers, with few points at which a product is checked.
Many patients cannot read the languages on the packs they buy, so cannot check a name, a strength or a date.
5 · The evidence of a photograph
A photograph records what a pack looks like. It cannot measure what a tablet contains.
Typography, colour, layout, print quality, security features.
Format and plausibility against the manufacturer's pattern.
Whether they take the form they should.
Read back to the patient in their language.
A failed batch can look exactly like a good one.
A faithful copy with plausible details can pass.
Identity, strength, purity and dissolution need a laboratory.
6 · Implications
At the pharmacy counter, the clinic store and the household — where a falsified product can still be stopped.
“No sign of falsification found” is a different statement from “genuine”, and must never be presented as one.
To the supplier, a laboratory or the authorities — not only a warning to the person holding the pack.
A patient who cannot read the pack cannot check it. Information in Dari or Pashto is a safeguard in itself.
These principles shape the counterfeit-medicine scan.
Mohr-e-Aseel (2026). Substandard and falsified medicines. 21 October 2026. https://mohreaseel.com/research/substandard-and-falsified-medicines